Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22874 (CHH)

TIRKI RAFAIL v. SMT. SUBATI

WP227/269/2024 · 2026-06-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25529 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 269 of 2024 1 - Tirki Rafail S/o Late S. Tirki Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Dilmili, Police Station - Parpa, Tahsil Darbha, Dist. Bastar, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Subati D/o Late Sukhdev Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Dilmili, P.S. - Parpa, Tahsil Darbha, Dist. Bastar, C.G. 2 - Smt. Gonchi W/o Late Sukhdev Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Dilmili, P.S. - Parpa, Tahsil Darbha, Dist. Bastar, C.G. 3 - Smt. Subli D/o Late Sukhdev Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Dilmili, P.S. - Parpa, Tahsil Darbha, Dist. Bastar, C.G. 4 - Smt. Kupli D/o Late Sukhdev Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Dilmili, P.S. - Parpa, Tahsil Darbha, Dist. Bastar, C.G. 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bastar, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Jha, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Devershi Thakur, Advocate. For State : Mr. Rohan Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 22/06/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.06.23 11:20:26 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/opposite parties has no objection. 3. On the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok