Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2287 (CAL)

RITUPARNA DAS NEE SAHA v. SAYANTAN DAS AND OTHERS

CRR/2563/2025 · 2026-04-07

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

07.04.2026 19 cm CRR 2563 of 2025 In the matter of : Rituparna Das nee Saha. …. petitioner. Mr. Kiron C. Saha Mr. Pratip Mukherjee … for the petitioner Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Ms. Sofia Nesar … for the opposite party No.1 to 3 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submitted to have received a written instruction from the petitioner expressing her unwillingness to proceed with the instant revisional application. Let the said written instruction be kept on record. 2. Under such circumstances, the instant revisional application is dismissed for non prosecution. 3. This Court makes it abundantly clear that the merits of the complaint as well as the proceeding before the learned trial court has not been considered by this Court and/or material points of allegations and the counter allegations are to be agitated before the learned trial court. 4. Copy of the order be sent to the Department and the learned trial court for compliance. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) 2