APHC010389782018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3548] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Nos: 2082/2018 and 2084/2018 M.A.C.M.A.No.2082/2018: Between: 1. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., NOW KNOWN AS ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., REP. BY ITS LEGAL MANAGER, NEAR DURGA TRACTOR SERVICES, ALMASPETA, KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. N LAKSHMI DEVI, (DIED AS PER LRS 2 TO 4) 2. NUNE NAGA SWETHA, D/O LATE NUNE PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 12 YEARS, HINDU, MINOR 3. NUNE PAVAN KALYAN, S/O LATE NUNE PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, MINOR 4. NUNE LAKSHMI KONDAMMA, W/O LATE VEERABHADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE (RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS AND ARE BEING REP. BY THEIR GRANDMOTHER NUNE LAKSHMI KONDAMMA I.E. RESPONDENT NO.4 HEREIN) R2 TO R4 ARE R/O AKULA STREET, KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT 5. AYYALA SUBBA REDDY, S/O SUBBA REDDY, AGE NOT KNOWN BUT MAJOR, HINDU, OWNER OF TATA ACE GOODS CARRIAGE VEHICLE BEARING NO. AP 04 TT 62617, R/O H.NO.15/420, 2 GTK, J M.A.C.M.A.Nos.2082 & 2084 of 2018 MADAKALAVARIPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. (RESPONDENT NOS.5 IS NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS PETITION) ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased tosetting aside the order and decree dated 08.01.2018 passed in MVOP No.261 of 2014 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum I Additional District Judge, Kadapa and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Order and Decree dated 08-01-2018 passed in M.V.O.P.No.261 OF 2014 on the file of the Court of The Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal — Cum — I Additional District Judge, Kadapa and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. D RAVI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 GTK, J M.A.C.M.A.Nos.2082 & 2084 of 2018 COMMON JUDGMENT: Today, when the matters are called, Sri S. Srikanth, learned counsel representing Sri D. Ravi Kiran, learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company, stated that a Memo is filed regarding the amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties in both the appeals i.e., M.A.C.M.A.Nos.2082 of 2018 and 2084 of 2018. Along with the said memo, a letter dated 11.12.2018 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, was filed, entailing the settlement of the matter between the appellant/Insurance Company and the respondents during the pendency of the appeal i.e., M.A.C.M.A.No.2082 of 2018, and requested to close the case as settled out of Court. 2. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company that the matters are amicably settled, which is fortified by the letter addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), this Court is of the opinion that keeping the matters pending will not serve any purpose and hence, these Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed on the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company that the issues are settled out of Court. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications, pending, if any shall stand closed. _______________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J Date: 02.01.2026 BMS