Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22866 (AP)

Smt. G. Naga Manjari v. The Principal District Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District

WP/29942/2013 · 2026-02-15

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010385212013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 29942/2013 Between: 1. SMT. G. NAGA MANJARI,, W/O. Y.V.S. RAMA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. UNEMPLOYEE R/O. 5-2-122/203, RAVI SHANKAR APARTMENTS, PHASE-1, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, MEERPET, MOULALI, HYDERABAD ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT, - 2. THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR RECRUITMENT. 3. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, (i) To declaring the action of the 15t respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner for the posts of Junior Assistant, Field Assistant, Examiner and Typist, Notification No.1/2013 dt. 20.07.2013, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable, violation of fundamental rights and in 2 breach of GO Ms No. 518 dt. 29.06.2013 issued by the State Government of Andhra Pradesh (GAD Service-A) and consequently direct the 1YE respondent call the petitioner for interview for the posts of for the posts of Junior Assistant, Field Assistant, Examiner and Typist and written exam of the posts to pass . IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37174 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent call for the petitioner for written test and interview to the posts of Junior Assistant, Field Assistant, Examiner and Typist to be held on 20.10.2013 and permit the petitioner to written examination to the post of Junior Assistant, Field Assistant, Examiner and Typist held on 20.10.2013, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass. IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 173454 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAVAN KUMAR ADITYA MALLADI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. J ANIL KUMAR (SC FOR APHC) 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3. N V SUMANTH 3 The Court made the following Order: There is no representation for the petitioner on various occasions and the matter has been posted ‘for dismissal’ today. Today when the matter was called up, time is again sought on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecuting the present Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 16.02.2026 BSM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR W.P. No.29942 of 2013 16-02-2026 BSM