APHC010382012020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25492/2020 Between: 1. KATTA SUBBAMMA, W/O VENKATARAMANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O MABBUVARIPALLE, H/O THAVALAM OF THANKALLU MANDAL, ANANTPUR DISTRICT. 2. KATTA VENKATARAMANA,, S/O K.VENKATASUBBANNA HINDU, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O MABBUVARIPALLE, H/O THAVALAM OF THANKALLU MANDAL, ANANTPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRATERIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MOLAKALACHERUVU POLICE STATION, MOLAKALACHERUVU, CHITTOR DISTRICT. 5. Y RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, R/O DUGGASANIVARIPALLE, MOLAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. Y RAMASUBBAMMA, W/O NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 82 OCC. EMPLOYEE, R/O DUGGASANIVARIPALLE, MOLAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direcdtion more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent No.3 and 4 in taking action against the respondent Nos.5 and 6 who are changing the physical featuers of the petition schedule property in I.A.No. 169 of 2018 in 0.S.No.77 of 2017 on the file of Honourable II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Madanapalle is as illegal, arbitrary and against to law besides violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondent No.3 and 4 to take action against the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 for changing the physical featuers of the petition schedule property in I.A.No. 169 of 2018 in O.S.No.77 of 2017 on the file of Honourable II Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Madanapalle, Chittoor District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to take immediate steps to stop the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 from changing the physical featuers of the petition schedule property in I.A.No. 169 of 2018 in O.S.No.77 of 2017 on the file of Hon’ble II Addl. District & Sessions Judge, Madanapalle, Chittoor District pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G ESWARAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Even on 21.01.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal,” there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, any Miscellaneous Petitions, if pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 28.01.2026 KKV