IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15848 of 2026 Decided on: 14.09.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Darshana Devi . …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vijay Bir Singh Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 and 3 to 5 Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rangil Singh, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respective respondents. 2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Leela Devi Vs. State of HP and Ors.2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No. 3310 of 2011, decided alongwith connected matter on 12.12.2011 2 representation for the redressal of her grievances raised in the writ petition. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above decision within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 14, 2026 Judge R.Atal