Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22861 (PNJ)

RAVI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/28525/2026 · 2026-05-25

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

222 IN THE HIGH RAVI STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Rahul Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for submits that he does not want to pursue the dismissed as withdrawn 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 25.05.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Rahul Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hardeep Hans, AAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition smissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-28525-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 25.05.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Rahul Kadian, Advocate for the petitioner. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner present petition and the same be All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE (O&M) the petitioner and the same be All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of. HIMANSHU 2026.05.26 10:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document