Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22861 (AP)

BHAVYA HEALTH SERVICES PVT LTD. v. APGENCO., REP. BY MD., HYD., & ANOTHER

WP/11610/2014 · 2026-01-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010384702014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014 Between: 1. BHAVYA HEALTH SERVICES PVT LTD.,, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.D.PAVAN KUMAR, S/OD.V.P.S.R.CH.PRASAD AGED 40 YEARS. SAIBALARAM RESIDENCY, SRI RAMNAGAR, BEHIND JYOTHIMAHAL THEATRE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APGENCO REP BY MD HYD ANOTHER, LIMITED (APGENCO), REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUTSOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD. 2. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGING HR, A.P.GENCO, VIDYUTSOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARAT BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO ) 2. V SESHA KUMARI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Ms. E. Somasree, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri N. Bharat Babu, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this case has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.01.2026 DSV 104 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014 05.01.2026 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 2. 05.01.2026 GRKP, J I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2023 I.A.No.1 of 2023 is filed seeking leave to grant permission for filing Counter-Affidavit. On account of the delay, I.A.No.2 of 2023 is filed seeking condonation of delay of 70 days in representing the Leave Petition bearing I.A.No.1 of 2023. 2. This Court has considered the contents of the Affidavits filed in both Interlocutory Application Nos.1 and 2 of 2023. 3. Having considered the averments in the Affidavit, this Court deems it appropriate to condone the delay of 70 days in representing the Leave Petition in I.A.No.2 of 2023. 4. This Court is also satisfied with the explanation given in the Affidavit filed in support of Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2023. 5. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2023 are allowed. ___________ GRKP, J Contd. WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014 Writ Petition is disposed of as Infructuous. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV