Unda Yerni Vijaya Ganapathi Krishna Kumar alias Mattu, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/4083/2026 · 2026-05-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2286 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2286 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010257862026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: Between:
1. UNDA YERNI VIJAYA GANAPATHI KRISHNA KUMAR ALIAS MATTU,, ,S/O. SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.36 INDIRA NAGAR CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.
2. BARRI TANMAYI SAI TEJA ALIAS GIDDI KONDA BABU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.36 KOTHA VADA VEEDHI,KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtleased to enlar No.1, 2 on bail pending disposal of Crime No. 95/2026 of Kancharapalem P.S., Visakhapatnam District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4083/2026 UNDA YERNI VIJAYA GANAPATHI KRISHNA KUMAR ALIAS MATTU,, ,S/O. SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.36 INDIRA NAGAR-VKANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.
BARRI TANMAYI SAI TEJA ALIAS GIDDI ALIAS RANJITH, ,S/O.
KONDA BABU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.36 KOTHA VADA VEEDHI,KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused No.1, 2 on bail pending disposal of Crime No. 95/2026 of Kancharapalem P.S., Visakhapatnam District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA UNDA YERNI VIJAYA GANAPATHI KRISHNA KUMAR ALIAS MATTU,, ,S/O. SOMANNA, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.36-93-301/3, VKANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ALIAS RANJITH, ,S/O.
KONDA BABU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,R/O. D. NO.36-93-301/3, KOTHA VADA VEEDHI,KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of ge the Petitioners/Accused No.1, 2 on bail pending disposal of Crime No. 95/2026 of Kancharapalem
2
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4083/2026
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 and 2, seeking regular bail, in Crime No. 95/2026 of Kancharapalem P.S., Visakhapatnam District, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20 (b)(ii)(b), 25 r/w 8(c)of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short “NDPS Act”).
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 06.04.2026 at about 9.00 a.m., upon receipt of credible information regarding transportation of ganja near Gnanapuram Railway Station Arch, Kancharapalem, Visakhapatnam City, the police rushed to the scene and apprehended A.1 and A.2. It is alleged that both the accused are rowdy sheeters of Kancharapalem Police Station. On questioning the accused about the college bags found in their possession, they allegedly confessed that the bags contained ganja packets. On verification, the police found two packets of ganja in each bag, weighing about 2 kilograms each, totaling 4 kilograms. The contraband was seized under the cover of a mediators’ report.
3. Heard Sri G. Maheswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State.
4
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present crime and that they are no way connected with the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioners have been in judicial custody since 06.04.2026 and that the contraband allegedly seized, i.e., 4 kilograms of ganja, constitutes a non-commercial quantity. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioners are the sole breadwinners of their respective families and undertakes that the petitioners will abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court.
5. Per contra, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and submitted that the petitioners were apprehended while in conscious possession of the contraband. She further submits that the investigation is still pending and the statutory period for completion of investigation has not yet expired. Therefore, she prayed for dismissal of the petition.
7. Having considered the submissions made by both sides and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds that though the contraband involved in the present case is 4 kilograms of ganja, which is a non-commercial quantity, the investigation is still pending and the statutory period has not yet been completed. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
8. Further, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that there are no reasonable grounds at this stage to
5
believe that the petitioners are not guilty of the alleged offence or that they would not commit a similar offence if released on bail. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit in the present Criminal Petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 07.05.2026 KKV
6
76
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4083/2026
Date: 07.05.2026 KKV
7