1 HN, J W.P.No._23380_2014 APHC010382012014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23380/2014 Between: 1. SURISETTI BABU RAO, S/O. APPALA NAIDU,, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, R/O.NEAR ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE, RAJUPETA VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 531 085. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR. 2. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT, OFFICER/PROGRAMME OFFICER, MGNREGS, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the proceedings issued in Rc. No. 188/2014 HR Department by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to service conditions issued in Proc. No. 143/SRDS/HR Manual / 2009, dt. 06.04.2011 and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Village Resource Person/ Field Assistnat under National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme to Rajupeta Gram Panchayat, Kotauratla Mandal, 2 HN, J W.P.No._23380_2014 Visakhapatnam District with all conseqeuntial and incidental benefits atttached to the post IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 29287 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 1st Respondnet in Rc. No. 188/2014 HR Department dt. 30.07.2014 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G ELISHA 2. 3 HN, J W.P.No._23380_2014 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that the cause of action in the present writ petition would no longer survive, inasmuch as the relief sought by the petitioner is for a direction to renew the contract. It is further submitted that the contract was terminated on account of allegations of misappropriation. 2. It is further submitted that the work was subsequently entrusted to another contractor. As such, the cause in the writ petition would not survive any further. 3. Recording the same, the present writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:10.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No._23380_2014 170 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO:23380 of 2014 Date: 10.03.2026 NKA