Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22841 (CHH)

KAMOD SINGH (DEAD)THROUGH LRS HARIDWAR SINGH v. Ramkhilawan

WP227/860/2023 · 2026-06-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25527 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 860 of 2023 1 - Kamod Singh (Dead)through Lrs Haridwar Singh S/o Late Kamod Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 2 - Radha Bai D/o Kamod Singh Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 3 - Krishna Bai D/o Kamod Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 4 - Chandrakali D/o Kamod Singh Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 5 - Om Prakash S/o Late Hari Singh Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 6 - Pratap S/o Late Hari Singh Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 7 - Kalesh S/o Late Hari Singh Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) 8 - Bhaleshwari D/o Late Hari Singh Aged About 13 Years (Now 21 Years), R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),.... (Plaintiffs) 9 - Itwari Bai W/o Kamod Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),....(Plaintiffs) ... Petitioner(s) versus ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.06.23 11:20:26 +0530 2 1 - Ramkhilawan S/o Late Amol Singh Aged About 50 Years Caste - Gond, R/o Village Bansajhal Tahsil Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.),.... (Defendant) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Govt. Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Order on Board 22/06/2026 1. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioners in two rounds, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok