Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22840 (JHR)

BINOD SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7732/2026 · 2026-08-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:24746] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7732 of 2026 ------ 1. Binod Saw, aged about 51 years, S/o Late Jagdish Saw, R/o village Hardiya, P.O. & P.S.- Hardiyar, District- Nawada, Bihar. 2. Upendra Kumar, aged about 39 years, S/o Basudev Mistry Saw, R/o Village Hardiya, P.O. & P.S.- Hardiyar, District- Nawada, Bihar. ... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P. (Through video conferencing) ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-18-08-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with NDPS Case No. 78 of 2026 arising out of Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) & 29 of the NDPS Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioners were involved in selling of Ganja and 10 kg. of Ganja was recovered from the petitioner no.1 namely Binod Saw and 5 kg. of Ganja was recovered from the possession of Petitioner no.2 namely Upendra Kumar and in total 15 kg. of Ganja was recovered. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false and the recovered quantity of Ganja comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 25.04.2026 as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Though, charge has been framed, but none of the witnesses have been examined. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI at Jamshedpur in connection with NDPS Case No. 78 of 2026 arising out of Tatanagar Rail P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 18.08.2026 Amar/