Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22835 (AP)

Vijaya Sri Tatimala v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5774/2021 · 2026-03-06

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010389712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5774/2021 Between: 1..VIJAYA SRI TATIMALA,, D/ O. SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.5-33, EDUPUGALLU, KANKIPADU MANDALAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.IMANDI LPYA 'RAJU,, S/O.IMANDI SUBBA RAO, HINDU,'AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-16-10A, YESUNATHAM STREET, CHITTINAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. 3.. PASAGADI .PADMAVATHI, , D/O.P.NAGIMUNNESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, C/O.P.P.N.LAKSHMI, R/O.D.NO.5- 33, EDUPUGALLU, KANKIPADU MANDALAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 2.SATISH BABU PASAGADI, ADVOCATE, S/O P. SRIRANGAM, HINDU, AGED 38 YEARS, DOOR NO. 3-18, SERINARASANNAPALEM (POST) BAPULAPADU, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.PARTHASARADHY ACHUTA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.SOMPAKA SHARAT BABU The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the case against in F.I.R.No.328 of 2021 of Hanuman Junction Police Station, Krishna District was referred as ‘False’ vide C.No.43/SDPO- GVRM/2022 dated 21.01.2023. Recording the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 07.03.2026 VTS