APHC010387152014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 39448/2014 Between: 1. SALAPU KANNAMMA,, W/O MUSALI, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O SALAPUVANIPALEM, H/O TADI, PARWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, PARWADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, (GVMC), ANAKAPALLE ZONE, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. RURAL ELECTRIC CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KASIMKOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing letters to 4th and 5th respondents in B.A.No. 15648/2014/ACP/G2/AKP/Zone dt nil.02.2014 and Rc.No.399/2013/SA dt 03.12.2013 not to grant permissions to petitioner's house in Plot No. 28 in Sy.No. 93 P, Salapuvanipalem Vilalge H/o Tadi Village, Parawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of Lida and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents to grant permissions to petitioner's house in Plot No. 28 in Sy.No. 93 P, Salapuvanipalem Vilalge H/o Tadi Village, Parawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 49478 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant interim directions directing the 4th and 5th respondents to consider petitioner's applications with respect of Plot No. 28 in Sy.No. 93 P, Salapuvanipalem Village H/o Tadi Village, Parawada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: On 27.01.2026, this Court has recorded in its Order that the Writ Petitioner is no more basing on the information furnished by the Ld. Counsel for the Respondents. Thereafter, on 06.02.2026, this Court has directed the Registry to issue urgent personal notice to the sole Writ Petitioner. 2. In compliance with the Order of this Court, the Registry has issued notice to the Writ Petitioner and has filed the tracking report from the postal Department which indicates that the notice has been returned with an endorsement that ‘the Writ Petitioner has Refused’ on 18.02.2026. 3. Having noted the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 23.02.2026 Mnr 4 89 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.39448 OF 2014 Dt.23.02.2026 Mnr