EX-RECT RAUSHAN KUMAR (ARMY NO.18013645W) v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
WP.CT/253/2025 · 2026-01-13
Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2283 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2283 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
January 13, 2026 Sl. No.36 & 37 Court No.1 s.biswas
WPCT 252 of 2025
Ex-Rect Roushan Kumar (Army No.18012591N) vs. Union of India and others
WITH
WPCT 253 of 2025
Ex-Rect Roushan Kumar (Army No.18013645N) vs. Union of India and others
Mr. Shambhu Nath Ray Ms. Munmun Das ... for the petitioner Mr. Ajay Chaubey Mr. Arijit Bakshi ... for the Union of India
Per, Sujoy Paul, A.C.J.
1. Mr. Shambhu Nath Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Chaubey, learned counsel for the respondent Union of India, are present.
2. In compliance of the previous order of this court, learned counsel for the petitioner produces a letter dated 12th January, 2026. The same is taken on record. In re: WPCT 252 of 2025
3. During the course of hearing, it is agreed that this petition may be disposed of by directing the Tribunal to expedite hearing of O.A. No.117 of 2018 and decide it within the stipulated time.
4. In view of the consensus arrived at, the present petition is disposed of by requesting the Tribunal to expedite hearing of O.A. No.117 of 2018 and
2 decide it expeditiously preferably within 3 months from the date of production of copy of this order.
5. With the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on merits, this petition is disposed of. In re: WPCT 253 of 2025
6. During the course of hearing, it is agreed that this petition also may be disposed of by directing the Tribunal to expedite hearing of O.A. No.118 of 2018 and decide it within the stipulated time.
7. In view of the consensus arrived at, the present petition is disposed of by requesting the Tribunal to expedite hearing of O.A. No.118 of 2018 and decide it expeditiously preferably within 3 months from the date of production of copy of this order.
8. With the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on merits, this petition is disposed of.
(Sujoy Paul, A.C.J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)