APHC010378632008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3299] FRIDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 28373/2008 Between: 1. BODAGALA MADHAVI, W/O. RANGANAYAKULU R/O. KOTHA MADHAVARAM, PADDAPALLY REVENUE VILLAGE, SIDDAVATAM MANDAL, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM, LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUDDAPAH, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, SIDDAVATAM MANDAL CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 4. S BRAMHANANDA REDDY, S/O. CHINNA RAMI REDDY R/O. CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVI PETA, BOGGADIVARIPALLI, SIDDAVATAM, 5. S RAJESHWARAMMA, W/O. BRAMHANANDA REDDY R/O. CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVI PETA, BOGGADIVARIPALLI, SIDDAVATAM, 6. S CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O. VEERA REDDY R/O. CHAMUNDESHWARI DEVI PETA, BOGGADIVARIPALLI, SIDDAVATAM, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature "Writ of Mandamus" declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner and not passing any order on the stay petition filed along with the appeal on 16-12-2008,is arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to take steps in disbursing payment of compensation/exgratia for the resumption of lands of Peddapally Village, Siddvatam Mandal, Cuddapah District, to an extent of Ac.1-31 cents in Sy.No.1051/1A, vide DKT No.937/1408 dt.20/10/2000, to the 4th herein, Similarly an extent of Ac.1-31 cents in Sy.No.1051/1B vide DKT No.938/1408 dt.20/10/2000 in favour of the 5th respondent and an extent of Ac.1.31 in Sy.No.1051/1C, vide DKT Patta No.939/1408, dt.20/10/2000 in favour of 6th respondent, pursuant to the notices issued by the 3rd respondent vide reference No.A/266/2008, dt.30/08/2008. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 37188 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including payment of compensation/exgratia payable by the respondents 1 to 3 herein on resumption of lands of Peddapally Village, Siddvatam Mandal, Cuddapah District, to an extent of Ac.1-31 cents in Sy.No.1051/1A, Ac.1-31 cents in Sy.No.1051/1B, and Ac.1.31 cents in Sy.No.1051/1C, pursuant to the notice of the 3rd respondent vide reference No.A/266/2008, dt.30/08/2008, pending disposal of the W.P. of 2008. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT 2. N MOHAN KRISHNA 3. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 28373/2008 ORDER:- Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a letter dated 04.02.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial), Andhra Pradesh High Court, on record submitting as follows: “The above writ petition has been filed by Smt.Bodagala Madhavi W/o.Ranganayakulu R/o. Kotha Madhavaram, Siddavatam Mandal, Kadapa District, against the 2nd respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner and not passing any orders on the stay petition filed along with the appeal on 16/12/2008. Whereas the Mandal Revenue Officer, Siddavatam, without issuing any notice and cancelling the assignment patta certificates of writ petitioner in granting DKT patta in favor of the respondents 4 to 6 as per the orders dt. 20/10/2000. In the above matter the Hon’ble court was pleased to pass Interim orders directing the 2nd respondent to dispose of the appeal and in the meantime not to disburse the compensation amount to unofficial respondents vide its order dt. 29/12/2008. Now the petitioner herein wants to withdraw the writ petition. Therefore, at the request of petitioner filing this letter for withdrawal of the above writ petition. Therefore, I request the Hon’ble Registry to direct the office to post the W.P.No. 28373 of 2008 under the caption of “for WITHDRAWAL” before the Hon’ble court, immediately for obtaining necessary orders.” 2. No representation on either side. 3. In view of the letter dated 04.02.2026, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J Dated:06.02.2026 AG 121 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 28373/2008 Dated:06.02.2026 AG