Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22828 (HP)

RADHA DEVI v. ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS

COPC/1299/2026 · 2026-09-14

Ranjan Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:39157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1299 of 2026 IN CWP No.587 of 2026 Decided on: 14.09.2026 __________________________________________________________ Radha Devi .....Petitioner Versus Abhishek Jain and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rohit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioner-Radha Devi has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court, against non-compliance of judgment dated 07.01.2026 [Annexure P-1, passed by another Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.587 of 2026, titled as Radha Devi Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, whereby, the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:39157 Respondents were directed to decide the representation [Annexure P-4] annexed with the said writ petition in the light of judgment in the case of Yashwant Kumar Versus State of H.P. and Others within four weeks, after affording an opportunity of hearing and by passing a speaking order. 4. Upon listing of instant petition, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that neither personal hearing is being given nor a speaking order on representation [Annexure P-4] has been passed as yet. 5. With the consent of Learned Counsels, this Court disposes of the instant contempt petition, with a direction to the Respondents to decide the representation [Annexure P-4] in terms of the order/ judgment dated 07.01.2026, in the light of judgment in the case of Yashwant Kumar [supra] within four weeks from today, after affording an opportunity of hearing and by passing a speaking order, in case, the said representation has not been decided as yet. 6. Needless to say that, in case, the representation stands already decided, the speaking 3 2026:HHC:39157 order in terms of judgment dated 07.01.2026 shall be conveyed to the petitioner herein. Notices issued to respondents shall stand discharged, accordingly. In aforesaid terms, instant petition and all the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 14, 2026 [Bhardwaj]