APHC010384502024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19651/2024 Between: 1. SK FAYAZ, S/O. MUTHAHAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O. PEDDAPADUGUPADU VILLAGE, KOVUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BLDGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVUR CIRCLE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVUR POLICE STATION, KOVUR TOWN AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SK KALESHA, S/O. BUDE SAHEB, PURNI VILLAGE, ALLUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issued a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the acts on the part of respondent No.4 summoning the petitioner to the Police Station and asks to sit from morning 7.00 AM to evening 7.00 PM and insisting to settle the civil issues with 5th respondent, pending civil suit OS No. 125/2024 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur amounts to erroneous. arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides being violative of principles of natural justice, without authority and contrary to law and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to involve in the civil disputes more particularly pending suit OS No. 125/2024 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in the civil disputes between petitioner and 5th respondent i.e, suit OS No. 125/2024 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur in the interest of justice pending disposal of Writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. G VENKATESWARLU The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19651/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issued a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the acts on the part of respondent No.4 summoning the petitioner to the Police Station and asks to sit from morning 7.00 AM to evening 7.00 PM and insisting to settle the civil issues with 5th respondent, pending civil suit OS No. 125/2024 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur amounts to erroneous. arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, besides being violative of principles of natural justice, without authority and contrary to law and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to involve in the civil disputes more particularly pending suit OS No. 125/2024 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kovur and to pass.…” 2. Heard Sri T.C.Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajya Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a case of interference of police in the civil disputes. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that upon receipt of a phone call on 29.07.2024 at about 9.30 a.m. from Peddapadugupadu Village, the police visited the place and advised the parties to work out their remedies before the competent civil court, where civil suit is pending. He would further submit that police never interfered in the civil disputes between the parties or insist the petitioner to settle the civil issues between them. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, recording the above submission, the writ petition may be disposed of. 6. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. However, police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 107 WRIT PETITION NO: 19651/2024 Dated 02.01.2026 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: WRIT PETITION NO: 19651/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV