2026:JHHC:25158 --1-- A.B.A. No. 4708 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4708 of 2026 ---- 1. Gulnar Bibi, aged about 70 years, W/o Murshid Ansari 2. Anisha Khatoon, aged about 30 years, W/o Abul Hasan 3. Ahmad Raja @ Ahmdraja, aged about 18 years, S/o Murshid Ansari 4. Abul Hasan, aged about 35 years, S/o Murshid Ansari, All are R/o village – Kenduatar, PO and PS – Karmatar, District - Jamtara .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi, Advocate For the State :- Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate For the Informant :- Ritu Raj, Advocate ---- 02/20.08.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.35 of 2026, for the offence registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 329, 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Jamtara. 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application of the 2026:JHHC:25158 --2-- A.B.A. No. 4708 of 2026 petitioner Nos.3 and 4 namely Ahmad Raja @ Ahmdraja and Abul Hasan respectively. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant have got no objection. 5. In view of his such submission, the anticipatory bail application of petitioner Nos.3 and 4 namely Ahmad Raja @ Ahmdraja and Abul Hasan respectively is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. Now this petition is surviving only for petitioner Nos.1 and 2. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the entire family members have been made accused and petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are lady members of family and the altercation took place due to land dispute. He further submits that so far petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are concerned there are general and omnibus allegation against them and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 8. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of assault and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 9. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that so far petitioner Nos.1 and 2 are concerned they are lady members of the family and it has been pointed out that the altercation took place due to land dispute and there are general and omnibus allegation against them 2026:JHHC:25158 --3-- A.B.A. No. 4708 of 2026 and in view of that I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos.1 and 2, namely, Gulnar Bibi and Anisha Khatoon respectively. 10. Accordingly, petitioner Nos.1 and 2, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, petitioner Nos.1 and 2, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.35 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 20.08.2026 Sangam/