Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22822 (JHR)

SANT LAL MISTRY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/399/2026 · 2026-08-18

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:24900 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Cvl Case No. 399 of 2026 ---- Sant Lal Mistry aged about 68 years, son of Late Bal Bhadra Prasad resident of 154, Green State Kokdoro Road, P.O-Kokdoro, P.S. Pithoria, District Ranchi …Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Amit Bhushan, General Manager (Regional), Food Corporation of India Ltd. (PO, P.S & Dist. Patna, Bihar ….Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Deepankar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Mehta, Advocate : Mr. Shubham Sinha, AC to Mr. Nipun Bakshi, Advocate --- 03/ Dated: 18.08.2026 Having regard to the show-cause filed by the respondent, no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt application stands disposed of. It goes without saying that if the petitioner wishes to challenge the reasoned order (Annexure-B), he is permitted to do so. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Abha/-