APHC010387852021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE Between: D.Deepa, W/o Suresh, Village, Rekulakunta Panchayat, Brahmamgari Mattam Mandal, Y.S.R Kadapa District. AND 1. Sri Ketan Garg, Working as Sub Collector, Rajampeta Sub Division, YSR Kadapa District Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following The contempt case is filed alleging dated 17.9.2020 passed in Writ Petition perusing the material on record, this Court granted an interim direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.1240 situated at Jangam Raju Palle Village. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, despite the said interim order, the respondent No.2 dated 29.9.2021 on instructions of the respondent No.1 herein and pursuant to the said n IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No.1802 of 2021 D.Deepa, W/o Suresh, Aged about 25 years, R/o Lakshmi Balaji Nagar Village, Rekulakunta Panchayat, Brahmamgari Mattam Mandal, Y.S.R Sri Ketan Garg, Working as Sub Collector, Rajampeta Sub Division, YSR Kadapa District, and another. .… Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.Doddaka Harsha Vardhan Respondents: Mr.P.Subash The Court made the following ORDER: The contempt case is filed alleging violation of the interim .2020 passed in Writ Petition No.16639 of 2020, wherein after perusing the material on record, this Court granted an interim direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.1240 angam Raju Palle Village. The learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia despite the said interim order, the respondent No.2 herein issued a notice dated 29.9.2021 on instructions of the respondent No.1 herein and pursuant to the said notice, attempts were made to dispossess the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3209] JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Aged about 25 years, R/o Lakshmi Balaji Nagar Village, Rekulakunta Panchayat, Brahmamgari Mattam Mandal, Y.S.R … Petitioner Sri Ketan Garg, Working as Sub Collector, Rajampeta Sub Respondents Doddaka Harsha Vardhan interim orders , wherein after perusing the material on record, this Court granted an interim direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.1240–10 inter alia submits that herein issued a notice dated 29.9.2021 on instructions of the respondent No.1 herein and otice, attempts were made to dispossess the 2 cc_1802_2021 petitioner from the subject land and under those circumstances, the present Contempt Case is filed. 3. Mr.P.Subash, learned counsel representing the respondent No.2 made submissions with reference to the reply affidavit filed by the respondent No.2. He submits that the notice dated 29.9.2021 (signed on 30.9.2021) was issued in a different context, more particularly in view of certain complaints made to the respondent No.1. He also submits that there is no cause of action for the petitioner for filing the present Contempt Case and urges for dismissal of the same. 4. At the outset, it may be appropriate to note that the writ petition is still pending and keeping in view the limited jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act and more particularly in the light of the specific averments made in paragraph No.7 of the reply affidavit, which is extracted hereunder, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek recourse to law in the event any fresh cause of action arises. 7. I humbly submit that I have not disobeyed Hon'ble court interim order issued in W.P. No.16639/2020 Dated 07-09-2020 at any time and not trying to disposes the petitioner from the land in Sy. No. 1240/10 ext. 1-00 Acs of Jangamraju palli village of B. Mattam Mandal. There is no any proposal to acquire the land, and also assign the land to others. It is only the fear of petitioner against suit filed by the Respondent No: 5 in local court. This respondent was issued a notice on 30-09-2021 only to ascertain facts regarding title right over the land in question and due process of law have been followed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J Date: 08.1.2026 / vasu