APHC010382492017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] SATURDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1279/2017 Between: 1. GUTTI VEERANJANEYULU, S/O. SURYA NARAYANA,, WATER SERVICING CENTRE, SHOP NO.3, SIMHALAMEDA, R/O. D.NO. 1- 548, NEAR LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY TEMPLE, MANGALAGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., 2. GUDISE PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O. PRAKASA RAO,, CHANDRA BIKE MECHANICS , SHOP NO.2, SIMHALAMEDA, RIO. D.NO. 1-548, NEAR LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY TEMPLE, MANGALAGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.. 3. BHAGAVATHULA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. KANAKAIAH,, NAVEEN ELECTRICS SHOP NO.1, SIMHALAMEDA, RIO. D.NO. 1-548, NEAR LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY TEMPLE, MANGALAGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. A P ENDOWMENTS TRIBUNAL, PEDDAKAKANI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT GUNTUR, GUNTUR DSITRICT, A.P., 3. SRI NANDYALA NARAYANAMMA SAI VAISHANAVA RAMANUJA KUTAM, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P., 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or orders or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Certiorari by calling for the records relating to the common order dated 21.09.2016 in OA.Nos. 767/2011, 768/2011 and 769/2011 passed by the A.P. Endowments Tribunal at Peddakakani, Amaravathi and quash the same IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 1418 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of common order dated 21.09.2016 in OA.Nos.767/2011, 768/2011 and 769/2011 passed by the A.P. Endowments Tribunal at Peddakakani, Amaravathi IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WVMP 3603 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order dated: 06.01.2017 passed in WP.No.1279/2017 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1279 OF 2017 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the orders passed by the Endowments Tribunal dated 21.09.2016 in O.A.Nos.767, 768 & 769 of 2011. At the time of admission of the matter, learned counsel for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that any order of the Tribunal cannot be assailed by way of Writ Petition under the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court and it should be assailed by way of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, this court passed an order directing to convert the Writ Petition as CMA. Accordingly, the same was converted as C.M.A.No.1256 of 2017. After that, the said CMA was heard and disposed of by this Court on 17.10.2025. The operative portion of the order dated 17.10.2025 passed in C.M.A.No.1256 of 2017 is extracted hereunder: “Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands disposed of by confirming the order of the Tribunal to the extent of directing the appellants/respondents therein to vacate and deliver vacant possession of the subject property. Insofar as the direction to the extent of payment of damages is concerned, the order is set aside. Further, the appellants shall vacate and deliver 4 possession of the subject property to the Institution within two (02) months from today. Failing which, the respondent-Institution is at liberty to take appropriate steps as directed by the Tribunal. There shall be no order as to costs.” 3. In view of disposal of the CMA, the present Writ Petition becomes infructuous and no further orders are necessary. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.01.2026 BSP/TPS 5 03 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.1279 of 2017 31.01.2026 BSP/TPS