1 2026:CGHC:24401 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5086 of 2026 • Mayank Soni S/o Sanjay Soni Aged About 26 Years R/o Behind Of Bamleshwari Mandir Dd Nagar Danganiya Police Station -Dd Nagar District Raipur C.G. ... Applicant(s) versus • State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer P.S. Tikrapara District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Government Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 17.06.2026 1. This is the second bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 610/2024 registered at Police Station-Tikrapara, District-Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 331(4), 305-A, 111(4), (7) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 01.08.2024 complainant Vijay Sharma, lodged the Complainant to the Police Station Tikrapara, District Raipur (C.G.), with the averment that on VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2026.06.23 14:45:07 +0530 2 31.07.2024 he seen through CCTV Camera that the lock of his office situated at Kamal Vihar Raipur was broken so he went to office and saw that the golden and silver ornaments and cash of Rs. 20,000/- total amounting Rs. 30,000/- were stolen by some unknown person so on the said report crime was registered against the unknown persons and, during investigation, the present applicant was taken into custody in connection with Crime No.32/2025 registered at Police Station New Rajendra Nagar, his memorandum statement was recorded and, after production of warrant, arrested in the present crime and charge-sheet has been filed. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the first bail application was rejected by this Court on merits vide order dated 07.08.2025 passed in MCRC No.5423 of 2025 and, therefore, this second bail application is filed on the ground that out of 10 witnesses, the statement of only two witnesses have been recorded, further charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case and the applicant is in jail since 20.03.2025 and the conclusion of trial is likely to take some time, therefore, he prays for releasing the applicant on regular bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. From perusal of the records, it transpires that from the memorandum statements of the applicant and co-accused- Ritik Verma that the applicant alongwith co-accused person is stated to have committed robbery in the office of the complainant and had also committed similarly situated offence of loot and robbery at different places 3 between the period May, 2024 to December, 2024 and have sold the looted ornaments to Ashok Soni, owner of Mahadev Jewellers and said fact has also been admitted by co-accused- Ashok Soni in his memorandum statement that the applicant and co-accused- Ritik Verma are main accused in the instant crime and they have sold looted ornaments to him and, even otherwise, this is the second bail application of the applicant and first bail application of the applicant was rejected on merits by this Court vide order dated 07.08.2025 in MCRC No. 5423 of 2025 and this second bail application is being filed on the ground that out of 10 witnesses, the statement of only two witnesses have been recorded. As such, there appears to be no new good ground to grant bail to the applicant that too when as per Part-D of the instant bail application, 04 other crimes of like nature are already registered and pending against the applicant and, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case to grant second bail to the applicant. 7. Accordingly, the second bail application of the applicant- Mayank Soni, involved in Crime No.610/2024 registered at Police Station- Tikrapara, District-Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 331(4), 305-A, 111(4), (7) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, is rejected at this stage. 8. Needless to say that the trial Court concerned is at liberty to proceed and conclude the trial expeditiously. 9. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Vaishali