M/S SRI VENKATA RAMANA PRINTING AND DYEING WORKS , RAJAHMUND v. THE COMMISIOENR OFCENTRAL EXCISE, VISAKHAPATNAM.
CEA/37/2007 · 2026-01-19
R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22808 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22808 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010388662007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALS NO: 37/2007 Between:
1. M/S SRI VENKATA RAMANA PRINTING AND DYEING WORKS , RAJAHMUND, M/S SRI VENKATA RAMANA PRINTING AND DYEING WORKS JAYASREE GARDENS, ANALA VENKATA APPA RAO ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY. AP
...APPELLANT AND
1. THE COMMISIOENR OFCENTRAL EXCISE VISAKHAPATNAM, The Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs House, Port Area,
...RESPONDENT formulate the substantial questions of law enumerated above and allow the appeal by setting aside the impugned order of the Tribunal bearing no.1456 to 1459/06 dated 25-8-06 in Appeal No. E/1310/98 in so far as confirming the duty demand for shorter period of six months with penallty on confirmed duty IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CEAMP 38 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an interim order staying the operation of the Final Order no.1456 to 1459/06 dated 25-8-06 in Appeal No. E/1310/98 by the Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal in so far as confirming the duty demand for shorter period of six months with penalty @ 10
% on confirmed duty during the pendency of the appeal before this Hon'ble Court in the ends of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CEAMP 73 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing in CEA.No. 37 of 2007 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant:
1. VENKATA RANGADAS KANURI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. D NAGARAJA KUMARI
The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter has become infructuous due to passage of time. Accordingly, the Central Excise Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
_________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date:20.01.2026 MJA
194
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALS NO: 37/2007
Date:20.01.2026 MJA