Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22807 (KAR)

SMT. B. M. SOWBHAGYA v. SMT. MUNIVENKATAMMA

RFA/287/2021 · 2026-06-19

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30495 RFA No. 287 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 287 OF 2021 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. B. M. SOWBHAGYA D/O. B V MARI, W/O. BASAVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 178, SRI. NANJUNDESHWARI NILAYA, CHAMUNDESHWARI LAYOUT, GANGAGONDANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, LAKSHMIPUR POST, DASANAPUR HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE – 562 162. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MASUR RAVINDRA KRISHNARAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. MUNIVENKATAMMA W/O. LATE. B V MARI, R/AT NO. 84, (OLD NO. 13,) NEXT TO KRISHNA TEMPLE, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPUR POST, BANGALORE – 560 097. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30495 RFA No. 287 of 2021 2. SRI. GURURAJ S/O. LATE. B V MARI, R/AT NO. NA890, BEL COLONY, NAGALAND CIRCLE, JALAHALLI POST, BANGALORE – 560 013. 3. SMT. GIRIJA B M S/O LATE. B V MARI, R/AT NO. 84, (OLD NO. 13,) NEXT TO KRISHNA TEMPLE, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPUR POST, BANGALORE – 560 097. 4. SMT. PADMAVATHI D/O. LATE. B V MARI, WIFE OF MAHADEV AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO. 84, (OLD NO. 13,) NEXT TO KRISHNA TEMPLE, DODDABOMMASANDRA, VIDYARANYAPUR POST, BANGALORE – 560 097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HALESH R G, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; SRI. A. RAMANJANAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.11.2020 PASSED IN OS.No.8792/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU AND ETC., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30495 RFA No. 287 of 2021 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT The order sheet discloses that the appellant is continuously absent. Therefore, as per Order XLI Rule 17 of CPC, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE KA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 57