Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22806 (HP)

TASHI WANGMO v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/15958/2026 · 2026-09-14

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 15958 of 2026. Decided on : 14 th September , 2026 Tashi Wangmo ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. C.D. Negi and Mr. Vikrant, Advocates. For the respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Ms. Seema Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Rajesh Kosh, learned counsel appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and 4, respectively. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter has been heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that her representation Annexure P-7 seeking applicability of Sunder Singh vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.2 and Balo Devi & Ors. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.3, has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Civil Appeal No. 6309 of 2017 decided on 08.03.2028. 3 Civil Appeal No. 4792 of 2022 decided on 18.07.2022. 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation Annexure P-7 in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgments within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 14th September, 2026. (jai)