IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.965 of 2026 Pramod Kumar Mohanty …. Petitioner(s) Sk. Zafarulla, Adv. versus- Dayanidhi Jena …. Opposite Party(s) Miss Bini Mishra, Adv. CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. 03. ORDER 25.06.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. In filing the present CRLMC, the Petitioner being the issuer of the cheque in question, has challenged the impugned order dated 30.08.2025 passed by the learned J.M.F.C, Soro in 1CC Case No.42 of 2020 wherein the petition at the instance of the Petitioner for further hearing on the order of interim compensation passed on 18.07.2022 has been rejected. 3. Heard. 4. At the outset, learned counsel for the Opposite Party/complainant bringing to the notice of this Court to the order dated 10.08.2023 passed in CRLMC No.2221 of 2022 at the instance of the brother of the Petitioner pertaining to the selfsame dispute, submits that instead of complying with the said order dated 10.08.2023, the Petitioner and his brother are busy in filing petitions after Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 30-Jun-2026 11:30:33 Signature Not Verified petitions only with an intention to linger the proceedings before the learned Court in seisin over the matter. The order dated 10.08.2023 is extracted herein below:- “ 10.08.2023 05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual / Physical Mode). 2. For the reasons stated therein and taking into consideration the rival submission, the operation of the impugned order passed on 21.06.2023 by learned JMFC, Soro in 1CC No.41 of 2020 (T.R No.572 of 2020) is hereby stayed subject to condition of deposit of interim compensation by the petitioner U/S. 143-A of the N.I Act as calculated by learned J.M.F.C, Soro. It is clarified that in case of failure of deposit of interim compensation as calculated by the Petitioner, the benefit of this order shall not be extended to him. 3. Accordingly, the I.A stands disposed of.” 5. She also contends that trial in the above noted case is at fag end. 6. Considering the above statement made by the learned counsel for complainant and looking to the order dated 10.08.2023, this Court is of the view that instead of preferring the present CRLMC, the Petitioner should have complied with the order dated 10.08.2023. This Court, therefore, declines to entertain the prayer made in this CRLMC. Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 30-Jun-2026 11:30:33 Signature Not Verified 7. This CRLMC is, accordingly, dismissed. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta Designation: Personal Assistant