Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1880 CRL.P No. 101977 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101977 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
SHARANAPPA SALONI S/O HOOVAPPA SALONI AGE.40 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.SALONI STREET, KARATAGI, DIST.KOPPAL. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
GANGAPPA PROGRAMMER DIRECTOR, DUDC CELL, KOPPAL.
2.
SRINIVASMURTY KULKARNI TAHASILDAR GADAG.
3.
BASAVARAJ BADIGER, ADLR OFFICER DHARWAD.
4.
PRAKASH NAYAK SIRESTEDAR, SIDDAPUR, KARATAGI.
5. GURURAJ, REVENUE INSPECTOR, NAVALI, TALUKA KANAKAGERI.
6.
SOMSHEKHAR KOLKAR SURVEYOR,
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.11 15:04:10 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1880 CRL.P No. 101977 of 2022
R/O.BUDGUMPA, TALUK KARATAGI.
7. M.G.NAGARAJU LAND SURVEYOR OFFICE, GANGAVATHI.
8.
P. MANJUNATH ADC BELLARY.
9. K.H.RAMESH TALUKA SURVEYOR, GUBBI, TUMKUR.
10. A. SATHYANARAYANA S/O AADANNA AGE.50 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.CHANNALLI CROSS, KARATAGI, DIST.KOPPAL.
11. NALIA SAVITRI W/O NALL RAMAKRISHNA RAO AGE.46 YEARS, OCC.HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O.CHANNALLI CROSS, KARATAGI, DIST.KOPPAL. …RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR THE RELEVANT RECORDS IN P.C NO.
179/2015 DATED 04.09.2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GANGAVATHI. AND ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATED 07.04.2022 PASSED BY I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOPPAL (SITTING AT GANGAVATHI) IN CRL.REV.PETITION NO. 50/2021 BY CONFIRMING THE ORDER ON B REPORT DATED 04.09.2021 PASSED BY PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GANGAVATHI IN P.C NO. 179/2015, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1880 CRL.P No. 101977 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
1. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with.
2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
RHR/-CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 97