Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22792 (PNJ)

KAVITA RANI AND ANR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRWP/6689/2026 · 2026-06-02

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-6689-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (140 ) KAVITA RANI AND ANR STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Sourav Garg, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) CRM-W-814-2026 1. Application is allowed as prayed for. CRWP-6689-2026 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondent petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and to take action on their representation dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 01.06.2026 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Barnala (Annexure 2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP Date of decision : 02.06.2026 VITA RANI AND ANR Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sourav Garg, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab **** ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) 2026 Application is allowed as prayed for. 2026 The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and to take action on their representation dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has t the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 01.06.2026 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Barnala (Annexure IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CRWP-6689-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 02.06.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Sourav Garg, Advocate for the petitioners Application is allowed as prayed for. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the s No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 and to take action on their 5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has t the petitioners have recently filed a representation on 01.06.2026 before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Barnala (Annexure AMIT SHARMA 2026.06.02 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-6689-2026 P-5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 of Police, Barnala to decide the aforesaid represent petitioners and take necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. behalf of the respondents due course. Let a complete set the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to resp aforesaid representation dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the in order to protect their life and liberty. 02.06.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (2) 5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2 of Police, Barnala to decide the aforesaid represent petitioners and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab, has advance notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to resp aforesaid representation dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the official respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life and liberty. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No 5) raising their grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the considered and no action has been taken thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Barnala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab, has advance notice on State and submits that the needful will be done in of the paperbook be supplied to her during In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representation dated 01.06.2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the official respondents would provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.06.02 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.