- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29471 WP No. 14821 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14821 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHANDRAMMA W/O MAHESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS OCCUPATION FORMER, R/O KAREKALLAHALLI, NAGARALU POST, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577175. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. BABY YADAV B., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MARUTHI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE SUB-DIVISION, TARIKERE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29471 WP No. 14821 of 2026 3. THE TAHASILDAR, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577548. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SUOMOTU PROCEEDINGS BEARING NO. NCR/CR/2217/1998-99 DATED 24.10.2024 INITIATED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT AND THE NOTICE DATED 19.11.2024 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN CASE NO. LNDRUC/129/2024, IN RESPECT OF LAND BEARING SY. NO. 172 MEASURING 3 ACRES 03 GUNTAS SITUATED AT JODIHOCHIHALLI VILLAGE, SAKHARAYAPATTANA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, COPIES OF WHICH ARE PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-E AND ANNEXURE-F; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against the impugned proceedings dated 24.10.2024 - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29471 WP No. 14821 of 2026 initiated by respondent No.3 and notice dated 19.11.2024 issued by respondent No.2 as per Annexure- E and F respectively 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the proceedings are pending consideration before respondent No.2, I am of the view that no interference is called for at this juncture, particularly with regard to the veracity of the grant made in favour of the petitioner. 4. It is open to the petitioner to appear before respondent No.2 and pursue the matter in accordance with law. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31