Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22788 (KAR)

SRI. SUBBARAYAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18234/2026 · 2026-06-18

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29941 WP No. 18234 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18234 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SUBBARAYAPPA S/O DASAPPA, AGE ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. SRI K GANESH S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.1 & 2 ARE R/AT RAMAPURA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 049. 3. SMT. NEELAMMA W/O LATE B.N GURUMURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 4. SRI G SHANTHARAJ S/O LATE B.N GURUMURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51YEARS, 5. SRI G MANOHAR S/O LATE B.N GURUMURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29941 WP No. 18234 of 2026 NO.3 TO 5 ARE R/AT 161, 8TH STREET, BANK AVENUE, KALYANAGAR POST, BANGALORE-560 043. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJESH GOWDA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE-560 001 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, K.R PURAM, BANGALORE-36 4. THE TASHILDAR BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-560 036 5. SRI. L. GOVINDARAJU S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT 222, SLN HOUSE, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29941 WP No. 18234 of 2026 RAMAPURA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, VIRGONGAR POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE-49. 6. K. RAMANAIAH, S/O VENKATESHWARALU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT 5, GURUREDDY LAYOUT, B. NARAYANAPURA, DOORAVANINAGAR POST, BANGALORE-16 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE.N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION THEREBY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED PHODI DATED 06.02.2009, PHODI DONE BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT, WITH RESPECT TO LAND BEARING IN SURVEY NO. 145 AND ASSIGNED AS NEW IN SURVEY NO. 145/1 AND 145/2, MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 2 ACRES 20 GUNTAS, EACH, OF BAIYAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, VIDE ANNEXURES-H, H1, H2, H3, AND H4, RESPECTIVELY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29941 WP No. 18234 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, petitioner is having an efficacious remedy by way of an appeal against the impugned order produced at Annexure-G. 3. In that view of the matter, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41