Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22786 (HP)

M/S ICICI LOMBARD GIC LTD v. SAURAV CHAUHAN AND ANOTHER

CMP.M/587/2026 · 2026-09-14

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd. Vs. Saurav Chauhan & Anr. CMP(M) No. 587/2026 14.09.2026 Present: Ms. Raksha Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohinder Verma, Advocate, for respondent No. 1. Ms. Anchal Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. CMP(M) No. 587/2026 No reply to the application is intended to be filed. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of Manager (Legal) of the Insurance Company, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay that has occurred in filing the present application. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay that has occurred in filing the application, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO (MV) No. /2026 Heard. Admit. Call for the records. List for final hearing in due course. CMPST No. 14617/2026 As per report of the Registry entire awarded amount stands deposited. Since entire awarded amount stands deposited, execution of impugned award dated 29.11.2025, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushehar, H.P., in MAC Petition No. 55/2022, titled Saurav Chauhan Vs. ICICI Lombard GIC Ltd & Anr., shall remain stayed during pendency of the main appeal. Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 21173/2026 Learned vice counsel for the appellant prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to file reply/obtain instructions. List thereafter. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 14th September, 2026 (raman)