APHC010383572020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 25611 OF 2020 Between: 1. CHUNDI LAKSHMAMMA,, W/O. LATE CHENNAIAH, AGED 92 YEARS, R/O. LAKSHMIPURAM VILLAGE, DUTTALUR MANDAL, SPRS NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPRS NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAVALI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DUTTALUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. DUTTALURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, DUTTALUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DUTTALURU POLICE STATION, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI 2 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following order: Heard Sri Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. The present writ petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioner of the subject land admeasuring of Ac.0.89 cents in Sy.No.199 of Lakshmipuram Village, Duttaluru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, without issuing any notice or following due process of law. 3. On 07.01.2021, this Court granted an interim direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the subject land, without following due process of law, if the petitioner is in possession of the subject land. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents are presently not interfering with the petitioner’s possession of the property and that no further orders are required to be passed. 5. Having regard to the fact that, in the light of the interim directions in the case, the respondents have not interfered with the petitioner’s possession of 3 the subject land. I am of the view that if the respondents proposes to take any action for dispossessing the petitioner, the same shall be after following due procedure under law. 6. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 02.03.2026 BSK 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 25611 OF 2020 Date: 02.03.2026 BSK