Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2278 (UTT)

MANISH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/54/2026 · 2026-02-17

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:1028 BA1 No.54 of 2026 Manish ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J., Ms. Sukhwani Singh, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA assisted by Mr. Chittrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 1. Present bail application is filed by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Crime No.1242 if 2025 under Section 8 read with Section 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the incident narrated in the FIR is totally false and fabricated; there is no independent witness. Recovery memo shows half compliance of the provisions of NDPS Act on the part of prosecution. She submits that applicant has no criminal antecedents and he is in jail since 06.12.2025. 3. Learned State counsel opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has made out a case for bail. 5. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the Applicant-Manish be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court subject to the condition that the Applicant shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty granted to him. (Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J.) 17.02.2026 Arti