Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22779 (AP)

Annam Murali v. Sri B.Rajasekhar

CC/1983/2025 · 2026-01-05

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010381072025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1983/2025 Between: 1. ANNAM MURALI, S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 58 YRS. HINDU, BUSINESS R/O H.NO. 12-17-36, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL MAIN ROAD, REPALLE-522265. GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI B RAJASEKHAR, THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AND FISHERIES (FISH) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DIST. 2. SRI RAM SHANKAR NAIK, THE COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES, PORANKI BANDAR ROAD, A.P. VIJAYAWADA. 3. DR K SHANTHI, THE JOINT.DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE-524001. 4. SRI CH SRINIVASA RAO, THE JOINT.DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE-523001. 5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI (V) AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DIST. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents 1 to 5 U/s 10 to 12 of p. 2 Contempt of Court Act for committing contempt by wilfully and deliberately disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble court in WP NO.41701/2022 Dt. 19-12- 2024 and consequently direct the respondents to pay the total amount of Rs.79,49,390/- (rupees seventy nine lakhs fourty nine thousand three hundred ninty only) ie., Rs.71,55,750/- plus Rs.7,93,640/- together with interest @ 24percent p.a. from the due date of payment and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.79,49,390/- (rupees seventy nine lakhs fourty nine thousand three hundred ninty only) ie., Rs.71,55,750/- + Rs.7,93,640/- together with interest @ 24% p.a. from the due date of payment pending disposal of the main contempt petition and grant Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: p. 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1983 of 2025 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondents have complied with the order passed by this Court. Recording the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 06.01.2026 TVN p. 4 68 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1983 of 2025 06.01.2026 TTVVNN