1 APHC010382452017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 777/2017 Between: 1. KARANAM GOPI NAIDU, S/O LATE RAMI NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED SPECIAL CATEGORY ASSISTANT, DCCB BANK, VIZIANAGARAM, R/O NEYYILA VEEDHI, SALUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. YALLA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE PRASADA RAO, AGED 59 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED STAFF ASSISTANT, DCCB BANK, PARVATHIPURAM, R/O VIVEK COLONY, BELAGAM PARVATHIPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. Y.PUSHPANADAM, S/O LATE LAZAR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED SPECIAL CATEGORY ASSISTANT DCCB BANK, THERMAL BRANDH, VIZIANAGARAM R/O GUMMATHOTAVALASA VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. TERLI SRIRAMULU NAIDU, S/O LATE APPALA SWAMY NAIDU AGED 59 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED ASSISTANT MANAGER DCCB BANK SEETHANAGARAM BRANCH, VIZIANAGARAM R/O BANGARAMMA COLONY, PARVATHIPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1. SRI KEMBURI JANARDHAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED, VIZIANAGARAM-535 002. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondent herein before this Hon'ble court and punish him for willfully and deliberate disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.37752 of 2016 in W.P.No. 30503 of 2016 dt. 31- 10-2016, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P L RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. V UMA DEVI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 777/2017 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 31.10.2016 passed in W.P.M.P.No.37752 of 2016 in W.P. No. 30503 of 2016. 2. When the matter was taken up, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, fairly submits that the main writ petition was disposed on 10.11.2025. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioners are not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondent. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.02.2026 S D P 4 258 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 777/2017 12.02.2026 W S D P