Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22768 (KAR)

M/S POWER SYSTEMS v. THE OFB TECH PVT LTD

WP/9820/2023 · 2026-06-19

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30263 WP No. 9820 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 9820 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S POWER SYSTEMS NO 86, ROOM A, 3RD MAIN 4TH CROSS, 4TH PHASE, JP NAGAR DOLLARS COLONY, BENGALURU - 560 078 REGISTERED UNDER SECTION 58(1) OF THE INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI ARUN KUMAR M. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PATIL BHARATI TAMMANAGOUDA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE OFB TECH PVT LTD., GREEN PARK MAIN NEW DELHI SOUTH SHOP NO. N G2 C, UGF DI K84, DELHI 110 016 REGISTERED BY SECTION 2(68) OF COMPANIES ACT 2013. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. 2. BANK OF BARODA SOUTHEND ROAD BRANCH GROUND FLOOR, NO. 16/1, BASAVANAGUDI, SOUTHEND ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R1 TO NOT REVOKE THE BANK GUARANTEE NO. 1202IGISS200004 DATED 24.01.2023 Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30263 WP No. 9820 of 2023 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER IN FAVOUR OF R1 AT ANNX-D UNTIL EXISTING LOAN IS CONVERTING IN TO FLEXIBLE EMI FACILITY AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER On 11.06.2026 this Court passed the following order: ''None appears for the petitioner. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned at the cost of Rs.500/- payable to the ‘High Court Legal Services Authority’ Bangalore’, making it clear that if there is no representation on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders will be passed. List this matter on 19.06.2026.'' 2. Even today, neither there is representation nor the cost has been paid. Petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20