COCP-2527 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 115 Sukhdev Singh Gaurav Yadav and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. violation of order dated co-ordinate Bench of this Singh vs. State of was directed to furnish copy of inquiry report against respondents No. 5 to 7 in the said writ petition 2. of the inquiry report has not yet been supplied despite been elapsed in the interregnum. 3. Jashandeep Kaur, Vigilance Bureau Unit, Sangrur persons have been arrayed as accused in the said inqury and still is going on. 4. aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the State. 2527-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Sukhdev Singh Versus Gaurav Yadav and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. SS Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed violation of order dated 27.10.2025 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this in CRM-M-52869 State of Punjab and others’; whereby the learned State counsel was directed to furnish copy of inquiry report against respondents No. 5 to 7 in the said writ petition It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner the inquiry report has not yet been supplied despite elapsed in the interregnum. Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Inspector Jashandeep Kaur, Vigilance Bureau Unit, Sangrur persons have been arrayed as accused in the said inqury and still is going on. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to controvert aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the State. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2527-2026 Date of Decision: 21.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. SS Cheema, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-4) passed by a 52869-2024, titled as ‘Sukhdev whereby the learned State counsel was directed to furnish copy of inquiry report to the petitioner conducted against respondents No. 5 to 7 in the said writ petition upon its approval. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that copy the inquiry report has not yet been supplied despite 09 months have Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Inspector Jashandeep Kaur, Vigilance Bureau Unit, Sangrur, submits that 04 more persons have been arrayed as accused in the said inqury and still the same Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to controvert the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the State. alleging a Sukhdev whereby the learned State counsel conducted copy 09 months have Learned counsel for the State on instructions from Inspector , submits that 04 more the same the RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.26 09:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2527 5. 6. required to be passed in the present petition dismissed. 7 8. 21.05.2026 rishu 2527-2026 -2- Heard. In view of the facts noted required to be passed in the present petition dismissed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 21.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition; and the same stands Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No above, no further orders are the same stands RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.26 09:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.