Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28456-DB CCC No. 1174 of 2022 C/W CCC No. 118 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1174 OF 2022 C/W CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 118 OF 2024
IN CCC No. 1174/2022
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI G HEMANNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS S/O LATE N GANGANARASAIAH NO.119, DEEPA HARSHILA NILAYA GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT NELAGADARANAHALLI BENGALURU 560073
2.
SRI G MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LT N GANGANARASAIAH NO.8, HMT LAYOUT NELAGADARANAHALLI NAGASANDRA POST BENGALURU 560073 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI G LAKSHMINARASIMHA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS S/O LATE N. GANGANARASAIAH NO.93, NANDAGOKULA GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT
Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28456-DB CCC No. 1174 of 2022 C/W CCC No. 118 of 2024
NELAGADARANAHALLI BENGALURU 560073 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. ASWATHAPPA D., ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO SUMMON THE ACCUSED AND PROCEED AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE BREACH, DISOBEDIENCE AND NON- PERFORMANCE/NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT IN HIS ORDER DATED 29.6.2021 IN MFA NO.4369/2020 C/W MFA NO.4408/2020 (CPC) AT ANNEXURE-A.
IN CCC NO. 118/2024
BETWEEN:
SRI G LAKSHMINARASIMHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS S/O LATE N. GANGANARASAIAH NO.93, NANDAGOKULA GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT NELAGADARANAHALLI BANGALORE 560073 ...COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. ASWATHAPPA D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI G. HEMANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS S/O LATE N GANGANARASAIAH NO.119, DEEPA HARSHILA NILAYA GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT NELAGADARANAHALLI BENGALURU 560073 ...ACCUSED (BY SRI. ABHINAV RAMANAND A.,ADVOCATE)
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28456-DB CCC No. 1174 of 2022 C/W CCC No. 118 of 2024
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF BHARAT R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO SUMMON THE ACCUSED AND PROCEED AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILFUL AND DELIBERATE BREACH, DISOBEDIENCE AND NON PERFORMANCE/ NON COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER/ DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT IN HIS ORDER DATED 29.06.2021 IN M.F.A.NO.4369/2020 C/W M.F.A.NO.4408/2020 (CPC) AT ANNEXURE-A
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the complainants in both Contempt of Court Cases.
2. CCC No.1174/2022 alleges that, in violation of the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-A, the accused have put up constructions and changed the nature and character of item No.18 of Suit Schedule 'B' Property. Statement of
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28456-DB CCC No. 1174 of 2022 C/W CCC No. 118 of 2024
objections has been filed by the accused in the said Contempt of Court Case alleging that no change in nature of the property has been carried out and what has been done is only a temporary construction in item No.18 of Suit Schedule 'B' Property.
3. In CCC No.118/2024, the allegation is that constructions have been made by the complainants in the earlier Contempt of Court Case as well in item No.1 of Suit Schedule 'C' Property.
4. Having considered the contentions advanced, we notice that this Court has specifically injuncted maintenance of status-quo with regard to title as well as nature and character of the remaining Suit Schedule Properties pending disposal of the suit. The parties now contend violation of the said order. There are clear denials in the affidavit filed by the respondents. Since the question whether the order has been violated or not is clearly a disputed question of fact and since allegations are made by both the parties against each other, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case where the contempt jurisdiction of this Court is liable to be invoked. We therefore
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28456-DB CCC No. 1174 of 2022 C/W CCC No. 118 of 2024
dispose of this Contempt of Court Case directing the parties to comply with the order of status-quo issued by this Court. In case any alteration of such order is necessary, it is for the parties to approach the Court and seek permission for the said purpose.
Notice issued to the accused/respondents in both the Contempt of Court Cases shall stand discharged.
Pending application(s), if any also stand disposed of.
Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
PN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 12