APHC010710152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 127/2026 Between: 1. SAYED BASHA KHADRI, S/O. LATE S.GAFFAR SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.9/652, MYDUKUR ROAD, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, EAST SECTION, APSPDCL, ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT, 33/LLKV SS POWER HOUSE COMPOUND, GANDHI ROAD, BESIDE MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.516360 3. K SAYED INAYATULLAH, S/O.LATEFAZULLAH SAHEB, R/O. DOOR NO. 16/375, NADIMPALLI STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.516360 4. N DADA PEER, S/O.PEERAM SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.20/128, MODAMEEDIPALLE STREET, PRODDATUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 516360 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 in considering the representation, dated 22-10-2025 through which I has requested to disconnect the power connection which was granted earlier to the marriage hall/community hall, in an extent of Ac.0.21 Cents in Sy.No.550/2A situated in the premises of Nasurulla Saheb Darga Matam of Proddatur Town, YSR Kadapa District and also to take appropriate action on the same as illegal. arbitrary, apart from being fundamental rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to consider the representation, dated 22-10- 2025 sent by me and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 2 to 4 to act on the complaint, dated 20-07-2024 submitted by us pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. GP FOR ENERGY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 127 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: On 06.05.2026, this Court passed the following Order: “On 05.05.2026, this Court passed the following order: “Sri B.Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time, accordingly, post the matter on 06.05.2026. It is made clear that no further adjournment will be entertained.” Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, none represented the petitioner. In that view of the matter, list under the caption “for dismissal” on 07.05.2026.” 2. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none represented the petitioner. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 07.05.2026 PSA