Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22759 (PAT)

Sagar Dhangar @ sagar Dhagar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./39661/2026 · 2026-06-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39661 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2026 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna ====================================================== Sagar Dhangar @ sagar Dhagar Son of Ramesh Dhangar R/o China Kothi, Harijan Colony, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Special NDPS Case No. 172 of 2026 arising out of Budha Colony P.S. Case No.162 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c) & 21(b) of the NDPS Act and under Sections 109, 132, 191(2), 190 and 125 of the BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from possession of one co-accused Akash Dhangar altogether 6.48 gm of smack was recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Recovery, if any, has been made from possession of Akash Dhangar. The allegation against Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39661 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/2 the petitioner is that when the police apprehended Akash, he along with others attempted to release him from the police. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.05.2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of four cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and that one of the bailors should be near relative of the petitioner. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Exclusive Special Judge (NDPS Act) No.II, Patna in connection with Special NDPS Case No. 172 of 2026 arising out of Budha Colony P.S. Case No.162 of 2026 durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T