Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22752 (PAT)

Deepak Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./42223/2026 · 2026-06-24

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42223 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2026 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Deepak Kumar S/O Hari Shankar Prasad Resident Of Ward No 15, Sitalpatti, Dhaka, Ps- Dhaka, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purushottam Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Avanindra Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Bishwash Vijeta, Advocate Mr. Sudhir Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Ram Naresh Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 24-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with NDPS G.R. Case No. 143 of 2026, arising out of Dhaka P.S. Case No. 199 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 21(a) of the NDPS Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that 17 pcs of PLANOKUF syrup and Spasmo-Proxyvon plus tablets total 94 pcs.were recovered from the medical hall of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42223 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/4 case. He also submits that the petitioner has purchased the said tablets from a medical shop. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel, and the police have not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. As far as the tablet Spasmo-Proxyvon Plus is concerned, the same is less than commercial quantity as per NDPS Act. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 13.04.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Under Notification No. S.O. 826(E) dated 14.11.1985 under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Rules, 1985 that preparations are exempted as manufactured drugs provided the preparations contained the narcotic drugs to the extent permitted in respect of codeine under Entry No. 35. It is stated that codeine and ethyle morphine and their salts including dionine all dilutions and preparations are considered to be manufactured drugs except those which are compounded with one or more other ingredients and containing not more than 100 miligrams of the drugs per doses unit and with a concentration of not more than 2.5 % in undivided preparations and which Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42223 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 3/4 have been established in therapeutic practice. 6. In this case, Planokuf syrup containing codeine has been recovered and the concentration of the codeine in this drug is approximately 0.2% which is less than 2.5% as provided in the above notification. 7. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently the application for bail and has submitted that in the case of Hira Singh and Anr. V. Union of India and Anr., the Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that entire non-toxic material which is mixed with the contraband will be considered as the contraband and as such, the quantity which has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners is commercial quantity. 8. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that in view of Section 2(d) of the N.D.P.S. Act, the drug itself is not narcotic drug then there is no jurisdictional basis for the case and the Court would not have a reason to go into the question of quantities. The Central Government has power to issue notification time to time. 9. Before parting, it is very strange that the cases where cough syrups containing codeine are recovered, the police is invariably filing cases under N.D.P.S. Act whereas in view of the notification of Central Government (supra) concentration of codeine being less than 2.5 %, the quantity Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42223 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 4/4 does not come under the ambit of contraband. Cough syrup containing codeine is only a Schedule-H drug for which, the shopkeeper has to maintain register and he must be a licensed one. Such type of cases should be filed under Drugs and Cosmetic Act. It is only the violation of Drugs and Cosmetic Act whereas, police is invariably misusing the procedure. 10. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with NDPS G.R. Case No. 143 of 2026, arising out of Dhaka P.S. Case No. 199 of 2026. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T