IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42372 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2026 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Khurshed Alam Son of Amruddin Miyan @ Amrudin Miyan @ Amarudin Miya Resident of Village- Jaukatiya, Ward No. 13, Chaubey Tola, P.S.- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No.247 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 303(2), 317(4), 317(5) & 111(2) of the BNS and under Sections 66, 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had secret information that the petitioner was operating certain mule accounts for cyber fraud and on this information a raid was conducted and from possession of this petitioner two mobiles and three ATM cards were recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the mobile and ATM cards which were recovered from the possession of this petitioner belongs to him. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the FIR it also appears that in whatsapp account there were certain chats Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42372 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 and voice recording regarding transfer of some cash. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from entire FIR it is clear that nobody has complained against the petitioner and it is not the case of the prosecution that the petitioner has cheated anybody through cyber fraud, even the mule accounts which are alleged to be operated by this petitioner are not disclosed in the FIR. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 05.03.2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Majhauliya P.S. Case No.247 of 2026. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T