Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22741 (AP)

THOTA LAKSHMANA RAO v. BOMMAKANTI VENKATA RAJESH KUMAR

CRP/2061/2025 · 2026-01-07

R Raghunandan Rao

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010371632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2061/2025 Between: 1. THOTA LAKSHMANA RAO, , S/O BASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.26-13-37, BESIDES KKR PLAZA, 2ND LANE, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. BOMMAKANTI VENKATA RAJESH KUMAR, S/O. LATE KRISHNA SASTRY, R/O C-15, SBH COLONY, SAIDABAD, HYDERABAD. 2. YENUMULKA SEETHARAVAMMA, , W/O. LATE VENKATA RAMAIAH, R/O D.NO. 1-11, KUNCHANAPALLI VILLAGE TADEPALLI MANDAL, MANGALGIRI. 3. YENUMULA SIVA NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMAIAH, R/O D.NO. 1-11, KUNCHANAPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, MANGALGIRI 4. YENUMULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.LATE VENKATA RAMAIAH R/O D.NO. 1-11, KUNCHANAPALLI VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, MANGALGIRI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the Order, dt.30-12-2024 passed in I.A.No.1143 of 2023 in O.S.No. 32 of 2015 on the file of the II Addl. District Judge, Guntur, 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the filing of the Certified copy of Order in I.A.No.1143 of 2023 in O.S.No.32 of 2016, dt.30.12.2024 on the file of the Court of the II Addl. District Judge, Guntur, in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No. 32 of 2015 on the file of the II Addl. District Court, Guntur, pending disposal of the main C.R.P., in the interest of . justice and to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacating interim stay granted dated 22.08.2025 passed in I.A.NO.2/2025 in CRP No.2061/2025 by dismissing the civil revision petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH VODNALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K V VIJAYA KUMAR 2. 3 The Court made the following order: On behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner an adjournment is sought, on the ground that he is unavailable. The matter has been adjourned, from time to time, for appearance of learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no appearance even today when the matter is posted for dismissal. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand closed. _______________________ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J CMK/SSA 08.01.2026