Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Ram Raj and another vs. State of H.P. and others
CMP-T No. 401 of 2026 in Execution
Petition No. 23 of 2026 [Item D-8] 09.09.2026 Present: Mr. Ishneet Rattan, Advocate, the petitioners.
Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2.
Mr. Vanshaj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
CMP-T No. 401 of 2026
An application has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 3 seeking correction/rectification of the clerical omission in the order/judgment dated 24.8.2026.
Keeping in view the fact that the order itself records the presence of the counsel for the respondent, and the office order on the basis of which the execution petition was disposed of, it appears that the presence of the counsel has not been correctly recorded. Accordingly, needful be done for recording the presence of respondent No. 3 in the earlier order.
Application stands disposed of.
(G.S. Sandhawalia)
Chief Justice
(Bipin C. Negi)
Judge
9th September, 2026
(Tarun Singh)