Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22737 (AP)

TELECANOR GLOBAL LIMITED v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/19372/2024 · 2026-01-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010379562024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. TELECANOR GLOBAL LIMITED, REP. BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT (ACQUACULTURE), S. UDAY KUMAR, S/O. UMA KANTH RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,R/O. FLAT NO. 505, SRI BALAJI ENCLAVE. RAILWAY STATION ROAD, YELAMANCHILI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMBILLI POLICE STATION ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of respondents more particularly respondent no.3 in providing police p IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19372/2024 TELECANOR GLOBAL LIMITED, REP. BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT (ACQUACULTURE), S. UDAY KUMAR, S/O. UMA KANTH RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,R/O. FLAT NO. 505, SRI BALAJI ENCLAVE. RAILWAY STATION ROAD, YELAMANCHILI, ANAKAPALLI ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI. ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMBILLI POLICE STATION ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of respondents more particularly respondent no.3 in providing police protection to the petitioner and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA TELECANOR GLOBAL LIMITED, REP. BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT (ACQUACULTURE), S. UDAY KUMAR, S/O. UMA KANTH RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,R/O. FLAT NO. 505, SRI BALAJI ENCLAVE. RAILWAY STATION ROAD, YELAMANCHILI, ANAKAPALLI ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR POLICE, ANAKAPALLI. ANAKAPALLI THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMBILLI POLICE STATION ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of respondents more rotection to the petitioner and to the property of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.253 in an extent of A c. 5.64 cents at Marrepalem village, Rambilimandal, Anakapalli District from land grabbers as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice. Article 14 19(1 )g, 21, 300-A of Indian Constitution and consequently direct the respondent no.3 herein to provide the police protection to the petitioner and to the property of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.253 in an extent of Ac.5.64 cents at Marrepalem village,Rambilimandal, Anakapalli District by considering the representation dated 19-08-2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondent no.3 to consider and dispose of the representation dated. 22-08-2024 pending disposal of the writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19372/2024 ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of respondents more particularly respondent no.3 in providing police protection to the petitioner and to the property of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.253 in an extent of A c. 5.64 cents at Marrepalem village, Rambilimandal, Anakapalli District from land grabbers as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice. Article 14 19(1 )g, 21, 300-A of Indian Constitution and consequently direct the respondent no.3 herein to provide the police protection to the petitioner and to the property of the petitioner situated at Sy.No.253 in an extent of Ac.5.64 cents at Marrepalem village,Rambilimandal, Anakapalli District by considering the representation dated 19-08-2024 and to pass .” 2. Heard Sri P.Kasi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioenr and Sri P.Ajay babu, leanred Assistant Government Pleader for Home, 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it is a case of not providing police protection to the petitioner and to the property of the petitioner. 4. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions would submit that, except sending the complaint to the police, the petitioner did not turn up to the police station. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 6. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the police authorities and pursue his grievance in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.01.2026 KKV