Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22731 (AP)

METTA KUMARI v. G.JAYADAVI

CC/965/2019 · 2026-03-30

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010382122019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 965/2019 Between: 1. METTA KUMARI, W/O. RAMAKRISHNA, AGED4LYEARS,TAMALAPURAMANGANWADI CENTER, NANDIGAM MANDAL, KASIBUGGA PROJECT LIMITS, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. G JAYADAVI, THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PROJECT, KASIBUGGA SRIKAKULAM 2. DAVALA SARVANI, THE PROJECT OFFICER(CDPO), INTEGRATED CHILD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PROJECT, KASIBUGGA ,SRIKAKULAM. 3. J NIVAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the 2 NV,J C.C.NO.965 OF 2019 respondents under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act willfully disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.MP No 343 of 2017 in WP No 306 of 2017 , Dt.04.01.2017 passed by Hon'ble Justice M.S Ramachandra Rao and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: 3 NV,J C.C.NO.965 OF 2019 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 965/2019 ORDER: The present contempt case is filed challenging the non- implementation of the order dated 04.01.2017 in W.P.M.P.No.343 of 2017 in W.P.No.306 of 2017. 2. No representation for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that pending the contempt case, the main writ petition itself was dismissed as withdrawn, and hence, no further orders are required in the contempt case. 4. In view of the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 31.03.2026 LLSSPP 4 NV,J C.C.NO.965 OF 2019 326 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 965/2019 31.03.2026 LLSSPP