HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 4069 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Yogendra Kumar, learned counsel holding brief appeared for the applicant and Learned AGA for the State. 2. The present anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of BNSS has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 7 of 2025, under Sections 318(4) BNS and Section 66 D I.T. Act, P.S. Cyber Crime, District Kannauj during pendency of the trial. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the accused/applicant has been falsely implicated in the cyber crme. The FIR is lodged on 07.04.2025 with the allegation that the informant has been duped of his money in the cyber fraud, wherein he has transferred money to different accounts mentioned in the FIR for the purpose of investment. He was allured of getting good return. The FIR is lodged against the one mobile number of Saumya Singh and seven bank accounts. The applicant is not named in the FIR. The applicant is not even connected with the said bank accounts. The statement of one Manoj Kumar Gupta, a witness is reflecting the name of applicant, wherein it is stated that the accused/applicant has given money and took bank account details as well as ATM cards of Manoj Kumar Gupta. He submits that the account number of Manoj Kumar Gupta is neither disclosed in the investigation nor the amount of informant is credited in that account. The accused/applicant has no criminal history, the co-accused has been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandan Yadav, Dipanshu Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dinesh Jain .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) granted anticipatory bail in order dated 18.11.2025 by the coordinate Bench of this Court. The applicant wants to cooperate in the investigation but apprehending arrest. Hence, seeks anticipatory bail. 4. Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant. 5. The scope of ambit of anticipatory bail is encapsulated in three insightful judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court right from Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia Vs. State of Punjab reported in (1980) 2 SCC 565, Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2011) 1 SCC 694 and Sushila Aggarwal and others Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another reported in (2020) 5 SCC 1, wherein it is consistently held by Hon’ble Apex Court that while granting anticipatory bail, the Court should considering the application of the applicant to evaluate the threat or apprehension of arrest vis-a-vis the nature and gravity of accusation, criminal antecedent of the accused, false or exaggerated implication, need of custodial interrogation, willingness of the accused to cooperate in investigation and trial and the conduct of the accused and flight risk. 6. Considering that prim facie there is no direct role of accused/applicant. Further this Court, while considering the gravity of accusation and apprehension of arrest in the case vis-a-vis low flight risk and assurance of the accused in cooperating with the investigation and trial, is of considered view to grant anticipatory bail. 7. The applicant- Dinesh Jain involved in the aforesaid case crime shall appear before the trial court or the Investigating Officer as the case may be within thirty days from the date of this order and shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with following conditions :- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. NABAIL No. 4069 of 2026 2 (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he/she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in the trial court. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order. 10. The below mentioned directions shall be complied with for expeditious disposal of trial, in case charge sheet is submitted against accused/applicant :- 10.1 As the investigation is continuing, in the event charge sheet is submitted and cognizance is taken, it would be the duty of the accused/applicant to appear before the trial court or Magistrate concerned as the case may be without waiting for the issuance of summons, within 60 days from the date of cognizance or on the date fixed, which ever is earlier. So that the trial may not be delayed for non execution of summons or processes. 10.2 The District Judge concerned shall direct each Magistrate and Special courts to maintain a register of Anticipatory Bail orders granted by this Court, wherein the details of Anticipatory Bail shall be entered. The dedicated official shall be nominated in each Special court and Magistrate court for maintaining the register. NABAIL No. 4069 of 2026 3 10.3 The accused/applicant shall provide a copy of the final order of anticipatory bail within 30 days, to the official concerned in whose jurisdiction the case lies and shall provide his complete contact details including the mobile number and E-mail ID (if maintained); any change in detail shall be informed by the applicant. 10.4 On the submission of charge sheet and cognizance taken, the Presiding Officer shall fetch the details of the accused/applicant and the dedicated official shall inform the accused at the given detail. May 6, 2026 Abhishek Sri. NABAIL No. 4069 of 2026 4 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad