Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22729 (ORI)

PRAMOD KUMAR NAIK v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/19056/2026 · 2026-06-29

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.19056 of 2026 Pramod Kumar Naik ..... Petitioner Ms. B.L. Mohanty, Advocate State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 29.06.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Therefore it is prayed that your Lordships would be graciously pleased to issue a Writ of certiorary or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned letter No.628 i.e. dismissal order dtd. 10.11.2019 1.e. Annexure-4 AND Issue a writ of mandumus commanding the Opp.party No.3/ The Executive Officer, Maa Tarini Trust to reinstate the petitioner in service to his previous post forth with continuity of service with all consequential service and monetary benefit including arrears of Salary/ back wages from the date of his illegal termination until the date of reinstatement. Page 2 of 2. AND Pass such other favourable orders, directions as this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray”. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of two (2) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Subrat