Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29363 WP No. 18252 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 18252 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
1.
NARAYANA REDDY S/O BACHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS RESIDING AT DODDAKADATHURU VILLGE AND POST, KASABA HOBLI MALUR TALUK, KOLAR - 563 103.
2.
ANANDA REDDY S/O NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS RESIDING AT EESHWARACHARI WATER WORK, IN THE HOUSE OF JAYAMANGALAL KRISHNAPPA, MALUR TOWN KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 103.
3. RATHNAMMA DAUGHTER OF NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT CHIKKATHIRUPATHI LAKKUR HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 103.
4.
CHANDRA REDDY SON OF NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT DODDAKADTHURU VILLAGE Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29363 WP No. 18252 of 2021 KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR - 563 103. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KUSHAL GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHINAY Y.T, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT KOLAR - 563 101.
2.
THE EXCISE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DIVISION KOLAR - 563 101.
3.
BHAGYAMMA @ BHAGYA BAI WIFE OF ESWAHRA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
4.
J. NAGINI DAUGHTER OF ESHWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS
5.
J. PUNYAVATHI DAUGHTER OF EESHWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS RESPONDENT 3 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT C/O KR SOMASHEKARA REDDY DODDA KADATHURU VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. AZRA J. DUNDGE, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29363 WP No. 18252 of 2021
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITTUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20 JULY 2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.155 OF 2014 (P AND SC NO.2 OF 2011) BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MALUR (ANNEXURE-D).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18